Decharging the word 'leaving'

This was actually a part to be done within a desteni-I-process assignment and the whole assignment as such has proven to be very assisting in looking at all the points that came together within one thought of fear and letting go of the points thus releasing the hold I was allowing the word, as how I was living it, to have on me.

So first, releasing the negative charge that the word ‘leaving’ had for me:

I started with allowing myself to freely associate words and ideas with the word ‘leaving’:

These came up: ‘being left’, ‘self-pity’; ‘going away from something/somewhere/someone familiar’; ‘loneliness’; ‘abandon’; ‘leaving the US where I had been as a child’; ‘emptiness’; ‘sadness’; ‘grieving’; ‘eave – getting dark’; ‘separation’; ‘change’

In order to get to the word ‘leaving’ clear of these associations and come to the core of the word per se and ultimately to my redefinition of it, I released the charge and the connections with the above-mentioned associations with self-forgiveness:

• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to charge the word ‘leaving’ with a negative value.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to judge the word ‘leaving’ as ‘bad’ and ‘negative’ within my mind.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ through judging the word ‘leaving’ as ‘negative’ and ‘bad’.

• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to ‘leaving the US’ and a sadness of having left a time of being ‘unburdened’ and ‘free and happy’ behind.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect ‘leaving’ to ‘having left a time of being unburdened and free and happy behind’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘leaving the US’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘leaving the US’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘leaving the US’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘emptiness’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘emptiness’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘emptiness’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘emptiness’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘sadness’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘sadness’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘sadness’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘sadness’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘grieving’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘grieving’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘grieving’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘grieving’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘eave and the feeling I get in the evening when it’s getting dark’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘eave and the feeling I get in the evening when it’s getting dark’’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘eave and the feeling I get when it’s getting dark’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘eave and the feeling I get in the evening when it’s getting dark’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘separation’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘separation’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘separation’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘separation’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘change’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘change’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘change’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘change’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘abandon’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘abandon’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘abandon’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘abandon’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘loneliness’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘loneliness’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘loneliness’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘loneliness’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘going away from somewhere or someone familiar’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘going away from somewhere or someone familiar’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘going away from somewhere or someone familiar’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘going away from somewhere or someone familiar’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘self-pity’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘self-pity’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘self-pity’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘self-pity’ in separation of myself.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to connect the word ‘leaving’ to the word ‘being left’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to define the word ‘leaving’ with ‘being left’.
• I forgive myself that I’ve accepted and allowed myself to separate myself from the word ‘leaving’ and ‘being left’ through defining the word ‘leaving’ with ‘being left’ in separation of myself

Now I can have a look at the dictionary definition of the word to get to the generally accepted and allowed usage of it::

v. left, leav·ing, leaves 1. To go out of or away from: not allowed to leave the room. 2. a. To go without taking or removing: left my book on the bus. b. To omit or exclude: left out the funniest part of the story. 3. To have as a result, consequence, or remainder: The car left a trail of exhaust fumes. Two from eight leaves six. 4. To cause or allow to be or remain in a specified state: left the lights on. 5. a. To have remaining after death: left a young son. b. To bequeath: left her money to charity. 6. To give over to another to control or act on: Leave all the details to us. 7. a. To abandon or forsake: leave home; left her husband. b. To remove oneself from association with or participation in: left the navy for civilian life. 8. a. To give or deposit, as for use or information, upon one's departure or in one's absence: He left a note for you. Leave your name and address. b. To cause or permit to be or remain: left myself plenty of time. 9. Nonstandard To allow or permit; let. To set out or depart; go: When can you leave? Phrasal Verbs: leave /let alone To refrain from disturbing or interfering. leave off 1. To stop; cease. 2. To stop doing or using. Idiom: leave no stone unturned - To make every possible effort.

---

1. Permission to do something. 2. a. Abbr. lv. Official permission to be absent from work or duty, as that granted to military or corporate personnel. b. The period of time granted by such permission. Also called leave of absence. 3. An act of departing; a farewell: took leave of her with a heavy heart.

---

intr.v. leaved, leav·ing, leaves To put forth foliage; leaf. Now, for the next step, I am sounding out the word and looking at the associations to arrive at a redefinition after having cleared the emotions and feelings

Leaving – evening – Eve (Adam and Eve) – Eden – leaves of tree of knowledge of good and evil – fig leaves – lives - living

Dimensions of the word ‘leaving’: Adam and EVE; being expelled from EDEN; in Eden – no shame (thus no fear of loss, no fear of change) – no fear of death (Eve ate from tree of knowledge of good and evil – entering polarity) – Eve was cause for humanity entering ‘death’ – evening – leaving eden – death; --- leaving the state of not being ashamed --> leaving is entering shame, makes one ‘see’ (have perspectives/interpretations), fig leaves, Eve is blamed, ban from GARDEN (planted by God), Eve blames the serpent; Cain (can), Abel (able), Seth (the appointed; placed by god – to replace ‘able’) – so ‘able’ is slayed by ‘can’ and replaced by ‘pre-programming’ --- Leaving the ‘pre-planted’/pre-programmed/pre-set(h) way to actually live, leaving the garden to live, Eve as the first ‘pro-ject-ion’ of Adamos (Atomos -the undividable); ‘the living one’ (Eve) is made to leave

Leave – live

polarity:

come; dawn; life – evil, death

Adam “dust; man; mankind” and Eve (Hebrew Ḥawwā, "living one") were, according to the Book of Genesis, the first man and woman created by God. Adam and Eve expelled from Eden

Genesis 2 opens with God fashioning a man from the dust and blowing life into his nostrils. God plants a garden (the Garden of Eden) and sets the man there, "to work it and watch over it," permitting him to eat from all the trees in the garden except the ‘Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil’ “for on the day you eat of it you shall surely die." God had already created the animals. When Adam tries to find a help-mate, none of the animals are satisfactory, and so God causes the man to sleep, and creates a woman from his rib. The man names her "Woman" (Heb. ishshah), "for this one was taken from a man" (Heb. ish). "On account of this a man leaves his father and his mother and clings to his woman." Genesis 2 ends with the note that the man and woman were naked, and were not ashamed.

Genesis 3 introduces the Serpent, "slier than every beast of the field." The serpent tempts the woman to eat from the tree of knowledge, telling her that it will make her more like God and it will not lead to death. She succumbs, and gives the fruit to the man, who eats also, "and the eyes of the two of them were opened." Aware now of their nakedness, they make coverings of fig leaves, and hide from the sight of God. God asks them about what they have done. Adam blames Eve, and Eve blames the serpent. God curses the Serpent and then curses Adam and Eve with hard labor and with pain in childbirth, and banishes them from his garden, setting a cherub at the gate to bar their way to the Tree of Life, “lest he put out his hand ... and eat, and live forever."

Genesis 4 and 5 give the story of Adam and Eve's family after they leave the garden. Their three children are named Cain, Abel and Seth. They had a fourth, unnamed child. Adam lived for 930 years. ("The woman" is given the name Eve in the closing verses of Genesis 3, "because she was the mother of all living"; Adam receives his name when the initial definite article is dropped, changing "ha-adam", "the man", to "Adam".)

‘Leaving’ is based on the concept that there is something external that one can depart from, which one allows to have power over one’s self (leave of absence), the polarity is ‘living’ wherein everything is Here. So leaving is a system word.

My definition of ‘leaving’: 'leave' eve by living EVE -------

leaving = Living EVE as and within Life

Find out how you are allowing yourself to be bound to words and thus to memories, emotions and feelings that limit you, instead of walking in and as self-direction and self-trust:

Join the desteni-I-process: http://desteniiprocess.com

Und Gott schuf...

Und Gott schuf...

... eine afro-amerikanische Mutter mit Aussicht auf längerem Freiheitseinzug als der betrunkene Fahrzeugführer, der ihren Sohn auf dem Gewissen hat (gelesen in democracynow.org vom 20.7.)

Hier sind die Hintergründe:

Gott langweilte sich einen Bruchteil einer Quantensekunde lang, bis Ihm eine Idee kam.

(Anmerkung: damals als Gott sich das Folgende einfallen ließ, gab es die Quantenzeit in den Dimensionen noch).

Nachdem Er, in seiner Allwissenheit und Allmacht, ja alles haarfein vorherbestimmen kann, fing er damit an

... Jurys in Georgia zusammenzustellen, die nur aus Weißen bestehen

... in diesen eine Neigung zu Vorurteilen Afro-Amerikanern gegenüber einzupflanzen, die weiter durch Impulse, in deren Kindheitsjahren schon, genährt wurden, alles schicksalshaft vorprogrammiert, durch Medienberichte, die Er eigens dafür geschaffen hatte, geschickt den Eltern unter die Nase geschoben, mit den entsprechenden, gutplazierten, geringschätzigen Bemerkungen über die ‚Minderwertigkeit‘ mancher anderen Rassen

... und noch einen Hauch von Minderwertigkeitsgefühlen Frauen gegenüber (denn doppelt hält besser)

Für Seine Idee benötigte Er Seine schon Jahrtausende vor unserer Zeit ausgetüftelten Kompensationsmechanismen, die in Seinem Großen Plan eine tragende Rolle spielen, nicht zuletzt um diesem nicht durch Systemüberlastungen vorschnell ein Ende zu setzen. Diese ließen im Subjekt Seiner Schöpfung den gelegentlich aufwallenden Ärger ertragbarer scheinen. Um diese komplexen Mechanismen hier noch einmal zum Einsatz bringen zu können - da Er ja trotz Seiner Allmacht schon auch etwas stolz auf diese war - schuf Er nun ein ‚Exemplar aus einer afro-amerikanischen Randgruppe‘, aus einer Gruppe bei der – auch schon vorherbestimmt - Ungerechtigkeiten richterlicher Art nicht ins Gewicht fallen, oder gar weitläufige Empörung mit den entsprechenden Konsequenzen auslösen würden. Dieses Exemplar Seines Schöpfungsaktes war eine Mutter von drei, von Ihm dazugeplanten Kindern. Diese Mutter hatte es nun – das war die Idee - sehr eilig mit ihren drei Kindern über eine fünf-spurige Straße zu kommen.

Doch vorher bediente sich der Allmächtige noch des von Ihm konzipierten vergorenen Stoffs, namens Alkohol, und eines, extra für diese Idee geschaffenen Mannes namens ‚Guy‘, der von diesem Getränk, in von Ihm vorhergesehener Weise, nicht lassen konnte - übrigens auch nicht von Betäubungsmitteln, deren Herstellung Gott natürlich bedacht hatte (mitsamt der Entdeckung der Elemente, der Wesen, die dazu beitrugen, der chemischen Sachverhalte, der Pharmaindustrie, der Lobbyisten und des gesamten Geldsystems das dem zugrunde liegt).

Diesem Mann Seiner Schöpfung, ‚Guy‘, schrieb Er in die Sterne, dass er schon 1997, also 14 Jahre vor der eigentlichen ‚Ausführung‘ Seiner Idee, zweimal wegen Unfällen mit Fahrerflucht schuldig gesprochen werde. Auch sollte Guy mit einer partiellen Blindheit geschlagen sein. Das war nun einmal notwendig, damit Seine Idee noch etwas mehr Schicksalhaftigkeit in sich trug. Denn die Menschheit sollte sich doch fragen, was denn Schicksale dieser Art für einen Sinn hätten und sich gerade deshalb noch mehr zu Ihm hinwenden. Nun sah es Gott so vor, dass dieser Unglückselige betrunken, narkotisiert und halb blind drei der vier Eiligen mit dem Auto mitriss.

Gott-weiß-warum.

Der 4-Jährige starb an seinen Verletzungen. Die Mutter erwartet den Urteilsspruch über die Anklage für fahrlässige Tötung und verkehrswidriges Verhalten. Guy wurde zunächst wegen Unfallfahrerflucht und Totschlag ersten Grades mittels Fahrzeug und Gewalt gegen Kinder angeklagt.

Doch hat Gott - nicht zu seiner Unterhaltung, sondern in Seiner unendlichen Güte - den oben-erwähnten, von Ihm eigens vorprogrammierten Männern der Jury die Möglichkeit eingeräumt in einem gerichtlichen Entscheidungsprozess Recht zu sprechen und dabei ihren unterschwelligen, und doch tiefsitzenden Emotionen Ausdruck zu verleihen, ihrem Groll nachgeben zu können, der sie sonst innerlich zerfressen hätte - oder in der Familie, in einem Streit mit den Nachbarn oder am Haustier, streunenden Kläffer oder Obdachlosem ausgelassen worden wäre. Diese haben sich sodann entschieden - gemäß Seiner Vorherbestimmung - Guys Urteil auf Unfallfahrerflucht zu modifizieren und dann, nach 6 Monaten Inhaftierung, die restlichen viereinhalb Jahre zur Bewährung auszusetzen. Gleichzeitig besteht die Wahrscheinlichkeit (aus unserer = menschlicher Sicht), dass Frau N. bis zu drei Jahre Haft erwarten.

Sind Gottes Wege unergründbar!?? -- Leute, es ist Zeit für Selbstverantwortung, denn, wenn man an die 'weise Voraussicht Gottes' glaubt, muss doch die Planung bei Gott so (in etwa) ausgesehen haben?! Alle wirken mit um den anderen - und dadurch sich selbst - zum Opfer zu machen.

Wie man das verändern kann ist hier zu finden:

www.desteni.co.za
http://equalmoney.org
http://desteniiprocess.com

On friendship and ego - video response to 'Desteni aren't your friends'

I’m placing the answer to a video called ‘Desteni aren’t your friends’ here, in which it is said that we proclaimed to stand for everyone, but our tolerance was in fact in short supply and we thought we needn’t justify the focus on our endeavors; also a list of banned people is placed implying some kind of ‘dissatisfaction’ with this circumstance.

Well, here is the response:

‘Desteni aren't your Friends’

This is an interesting title, because, in fact, if you were to be looking for friendship in the regular sense of the word, Desteni would not be the place to go looking for it.

Why?

First, what do you do when you are looking for friendship? What is your starting point?

Most of the times you would be seeking approval of some kind. Some kind of validation.

Someone to give you credit for how you are as a personality, what you think, what a great individual you are.

This, we don’t do.

We have come to realize that personality and individuality are based on concepts of self.

It is what we as the mind have accepted as knowledge on who we are, who we want to be. On how we can best survive in this world. We base this on ideas and projections onto others.

Desteni has realized that we are living ourselves as the mind totally.

The individual has lost touch with reality as a whole as who we are – the entirety of existence.

There is only self-interest.

Desteni, as a group, has established themselves on the universal principle of equality and oneness, which is the foundation on which we base our communication and support.

Thus we will not cater to your ego, as ‘friends’ normally do. If you really have a look at it:

‘Friends’ have an idea of you and want to keep you within these limitations because they don’t want to lose you. They are your friends because these ideas of you are in such affinity to how they perceive themselves. And they don’t want to be alone in this perception. Self-perceptions need to be fed, to be validated.

They do not actually support you, they support their own personality, which is not real either. It’s a pile of constructed information, experience, memories, feelings and emotions. Nothing that has anything in common with Life, with substance, with stability, with what is actually here as and within existence in its entirety. An energetic overlay.

So, indeed: Desteni are not your friends.

However, if you are willing to support yourself for real, to become real, to face what you’ve accepted and allowed, you will get the unconditional support you have always hoped for in a friend. This point of self-will has to be established within and as you, of directing yourself toward ‘becoming real’ as Self, as the whole, on the principle of oneness and equality. It is pre-condition for the support, because only in and as this starting point you are open to the support that is abundantly available on the forums.

So the purpose of the forums is not ‘standing for everyone’ and tolerating someone’s refusal to stand for and as themselves as equal and one, but ‘standing as everyone as equal and one’ if and when the desteni tools are walked in self-application.

As soon as it becomes evident that the starting point of being on the forum is not based upon a realization that we are the creators of this reality and thus based in self-responsibiltiy, a ban is placed as support – though this need not be the final word, if you forgive yourself. start over and be a real friend to yourself first.

You must trust yourself enough and dare to jump, dare to leave the illusions of the mind behind and be Here within and as Life as one and equal as all as you. Be Here as the entirety of existence that is you.

visit the forum: www.desteni.co.za
and do the desteni-I-process --- for information go to the site: http://desteniiprocess.com

and support 'equal money' to support yourself: http://equalmoney.org

Investigating ‘Reputation’

From Latin reputātiō a reckoning, from reputāre to calculate, meditate;

“I don't know if God exists, but it would be better for His reputation if He didn't.” - by Jules Renard - French Dramatist, 1864

What is reputation?

Some say it is the summation of a person’s worth. Can it be measured? Can it be equated to quality? To influence? To credibility? Status? Is it something empirical? Does it exist at all? - Of course it’s a concept and thus not real. - However, reputation carries associations, judgments, assessments, projections, ideas and values. It is connected to survival, money, wealth, property, social prestige, to a woman’s good reputation - virginity, to high ethical standards, laudable efforts, something tediously earned – to be built, to be worked on, able to be ‘besmirched’, to be lost, it is to be carefully monitored; something that is fought for, one wants to protect at any cost; it refers to the position one occupies or the standing that one has in the opinion of others, in respect to attainments, integrity, and the like.

Ideas in connection to reputation

· … of having ‘secret’ knowledge about how best to use one’s resources to create wealth – a reputation that allows a person to borrow against future expected income

· … of possessing superior management skills – a reputation that allows one to finance wealth-increasing investment projects – ‘reputational’ capital – as proving beneficial for the investment in capital

· … of one member getting a bad reputation and then ‘besmirching’ the whole group just by being a member - prisoner's dilemma

· … one must ‘pay for a poor reputation’ whether or not one has earned one, then one must repair reputation or fix it.

· … a bad reputation can damage your legal records

· … is connected to the number of times opinions have been cited, discussed, reprinted.

· … based on comparisons which provide ‘evidence’ that is used in trade-related phenomena – ‘reputation’ mechanisms

· … based on past actions – opinion created on it (opinion that proliferates opinion)

· … someone's ‘reputation’ can be damaged due to false accusations ‘smears’

Political science knows ‘reputation’:

· ‘Reputational’ concerns can make one compliant to rules, demands, law etc.

· ‘reputation’ is something that is put to work in favor of something (a means toward a goal) it helps predict a future behavior because it provides with information

· ‘reputation’ as a ‘good global citizen’

· ‘reputational’ costs and benefits

· ‘reputational’ analysis

· ‘reputation’ can be controlled through actions which are determined within ‘reputational’ calculations

· ‘reputation’ can be cabined to certain issue areas

· ‘reputational’ sanctions to enforce public goods agreements can be enforced (like those addressing climate change or nuclear non-proliferation)

· corporate ‘reputations’

Reputation and Honor is coupled in Early Modern England

· acceptability of violence as a means of defending or challenging honor and reputation

· a pious ‘reputation’ as key means of establishing one's honor, with the notion of ‘honesty’, following one’s conscience and thus also the ‘importance’ of ‘godliness’ generally

Reputation as intangible collateral

Mexico’s early industrialization (1878-1913) was based on firms that were grouped or linked through close affiliations with a common bank. Due to the absence of secure property rights tangible collateral could not credibly be offered to creditors; but there remained the possibility of using ‘reputation’ as a form of intangible collateral, thus firms had incentives to group together for purposes of mutual monitoring and insurance.

William Shakespeare: “Reputation, reputation, reputation! Oh, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial.”

In the 16^th century Shakespeare lets ‘reputation’ play a big role in his famous work Othello:

Lago uses his reputation as an honest man to deceive Othello and everyone else. He takes this cover to make Othello believe that Desdemona would cheat on him. If not for his reputation, he would have been killed for this suggestion. So he is able to plot against Othello, Cassio and Desdemonia.

Is cooperation likely with one of bad reputation? Benjamin Franklin, once said “Glass, china and reputation are easily cracked, but never well mended.” – Shattered illusions. Ideas about a person cannot be mended, they can only be replaced by other ideas. But it’s never the real thing.

“A good reputation is more valuable that money” – Publius Syrus (42 B.C.)

Will ‘reputation’ still be such an aspect with Equal Money? Will one still strive to manipulate one’s own and others’ ‘reputation’? The current system is based on manipulating reputation. Also individually: We fear what people will think. Fear that our reputation might be compromised. Fear that people see through the reputation that we have set up for ourselves to cover up our own underlying self-judgments and inferiority. So we manipulate ourselves and others.

We need to be ‘credible’ to ourselves again. To ‘believe’ what we are saying. Not ‘re’ ‘putting’ everything as ourselves ‘out there’ for others to believe, so that we will get something, to manipulate the system to our advantage, to color ourselves beautiful – ‘rep-u-tiful’ – reputed beauty – a ‘reaping beauty vacation’ = reputation; repeatedly creating / putting ourselves ‘out there’ as a projection of how we want to seen, to be ‘held in honor’, based on what we have done, so we can build on those achievements and don’t have to earn our trustworthiness and credibility anew moment for moment in what we say and do. So we build a reputation by repeatedly cre(h)ating ourselves in and as an ‘idea of credibility’, holding the idea of us intact to manipulate others.

Benjamin Haydon (1786-1846): “The great difficulty is first to win a reputation; the next to keep it while you live; and the next to preserve it after you die, when affection and interest are over, and nothing but sterling excellence can preserve your name. Never suffer youth to be an excuse for inadequacy, nor age and fame to be an excuse for indolence.”

A ‘danger’ within and as the idea of ‘reputation’ is that we create illusionary ‘self-worth’ from it, we believe we can take credit for it and have earned something in return, thus relying on a trade-off of energy, within which we in-debt ourselves and others. So here one can see the relation towards money very clearly.

The approach to and within this world is earning the respect to be taken seriously, to be worthy, to be seen and sometimes even followed, like a ‘specialist’ that has a good reputation and has credentials and degrees. Reputation is a game of power and a game of / for money. Reputation and survival go hand in hand.

All in separation of ourselves. – Let’s stand equal to this system of ‘reputation’ and transcend it as ourselves in seeing where we ‘reap’ ‘u’ - even ‘rape’ ‘u’ as ourselves in making u/you (ourselves) believe we are ‘beautiful’/wonderful/credible/honorable, oh so respectable – but ‘shun’ the ‘day’ to ‘pay’ because it is obvious that we are working with and on credit.

.Margaret Mitchell:

“Until you have lost your reputation, you never realize what a burden it was or what freedom really is.

‘Reputation’ is a system word that tells us to shun the pay for raping yourself / to shun the day of raping yourself / to shun what you say because it’s raping yourself / to “keep an i/eye on rape – u - (h) ate” Alexander Pope: “At ev'ry word a reputation dies.” Living your words as the living word in self-application does not allow for ‘rep/rape’ nor ‘hate’. REPUTATION = Put your eye on the hate (of self) wherein you have 'raped' yourself of Life